Silent

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out -

Because I was not a socialist.



Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out -

Because I was not a trade unionist.



Then they came for the Jews and I did not speak out -

Because I was not a Jew.



Then they came for me -

and there was no left to speak for me.



~ Attributed to Martin Nienoller (1892-1984) anti-Nazi German pastor



In an effort to "purify" German society, the Nazis transformed psychiatric hospitals and clinics into centers for mass murder. Using the cover of war, Adolf Hitler authorized the so-called "euthanasia" program, in which more than 70,000 disabled Germans, judged by their physicians to be "life unworthy of life," were killed in gas chambers or by lethal injection or poison between 1939 and 1941.



The quotes above are excerpts from materials I purchased at the United States Halocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C.



As I looked over these materials this afternoon I recalled how deeply moved and upset the Halocaust Museum experience was for me. If you have not had the opportunity to visit I cannot urge you strongly enough to make the trip. As homeschoolers it is an invaluable experience. Words, even pictures cannot adequately portray the emotions that hit you when you stand before the crematorium ovens with the actual shoes of those murdered in baskets beside you and their pictures floor to ceiling.


I remember the shudder that ran through my body when I thought of the millions of babies being cremated everyday after being aborted. A halocaust continues, sanctioned by our government, our courts and applauded by our President and Congress. I'm sure you probably know this, and yes it's grim but abortion clinics typically put the babies on ice and then, when they have enough to warrant firing up the oven, they cremate them too. The similarities are sickening. Experimentations, selling their parts, horrors done in the name of science. Can someone please explain to me why genocide is horrific but infanticide is not?


People lived and worked in concentration camps and they said nothing. People live and work in towns with abortion clinics and say and do nothing, today, right now. They of course, are not unborn babies. But this thinking, this belief system, this unholy lack of respect for life, this refusal to acknowledge the sovereign right of God alone to give and take life, it will not stop at the unborn. I hope those who carry on their lives each day without thought to the cremations happening around the corner never find themselves disabled, unwanted, mentally ill, terminally ill, or a burden on society. When the government is paying for healthcare will they be deciding who deserves care and who does not? When someone's care becomes a burden on the society, what then? When it opposes political trends what then?


We must speak for those who cannot. Not just because it is right, not just because God calls us to do so but if those reasons are not compelling enough then speak up my friends because one day they will come for you and who will be left to speak for you?

A Boiling Mad Housewife

I often use the analogy of "how to boil a frog" when speaking about Democrats and liberal agendas. If you place a frog into a pot of boiling water he jumps out immediately but, put him in cold water and raise the temperature very slowly and he won't notice. He'll sit still and die. To save time let me say go on and apply that concept to virtually all their ideas, they have an ulterior motive.

The boiled frog I want to speak of today is the "living wage." Before discussing the concept let's look at the word. It was once called a minimum wage, it was the very minimum an employee could be paid. It was to correct the behavior of industries who preyed upon the poorest by not paying any reasonable amount for their work. They were able to do so because those workers were destitute and pennies were better than nothing. It was in my opinion an example of where government standards and regulations for industry were reasonable but liberals hi-jacked the unions and the ideas to implant more socialism in our industries.

You have to hand it to liberals they have done a beautiful job of making us look bad on about every issue, this one is no different. What kind of ogre could ever be against a living wage and want people to live in poverty? A minimum wage is innocuous but a living wage has a different connotation, don't we want people to live? We ignored it, bought the marketing of the idea, and guess what? You need to wake up because it's getting a bit bubbly in this pot!

I do not support a Living Wage. I do support a fair minimum wage. Let's think about it, minimum wage is the MINIMUM someone can get paid EVER. The worst worker doing the easiest job has to make minimum wage. Teenagers have to make minimum wage. There should be a pretty big difference between the minimum wage and a living wage but they are now one in the same.

If people cannot support a family on the minimum wage then what shall we do? Maybe they shouldn't be pollinating families all over town until they have some skill or education that qualifies them for something better than a minimum wage. Maybe they will have to work two jobs, work and go to school, sacrifice, and pull themselves up a rung or two on the ladder of success. Ah! The horror. Why is that a bad thing? Why is sacrifice and hard work a bad thing? Why on earth would The United States of America pursue a policy that tells people they don't have to work hard to achieve a good standard of living? Why would we advertise that people can do the minimum, the bottom of the barrel minimum and live just fine? Are we really surprised illegal immigration is out of control? Or that our industrial jobs are outsourced, and we can't compete in many industries like textiles anymore?

This was the land of opportunity. Come here, work hard, achieve the American Dream. Now, everyone is entitled to the American Dream? No. No they are not. This dream is not a freebie, it is an opportunity, and it's the same for everyone they ARE entitled to the opportunity. All that means is you are living here and sucking wind...the rest is up to you friend. Some people pull better pole positions but the last time I checked the biographies of every successful person, ever, included some hard knocks and setbacks. Stop whining and just work hard, at something.

So yes, we need a minimum wage. It should not support a family of four, that's absurd. It should be commiserate with a completely unskilled young worker. Like my teenager when he was 16 and needed gas money, and money for fast food, movies, Cd's and such so he got his first job. Before entering the workforce though he took lifeguard certifications, so he never made minimum wage, he also isn't trying to pay child support for 3 babies by the age of 18.

Liberal definitions of living wage includes cable TV, cars, getting your nails done, $200 purses, coats, and tennis shoes, and a large family to support. YIKES! They need like $15 an hour maybe without losing all their government benefits too. C'mon, that is insane.

My definition is walk, ride a bike or take the bus (you would think the tree huggers would support that). Live with family if you must. Save your money. Eat macaroni and cheese everyday and go to church giveaways for clothes so you can save your money. Don't smoke, don't drink, don't use drugs, don't party, don't have a flat screen TV with 200 digital channels. I'll be over here holding my breath.

Here's what really roasts my potatoes - if we allow the market to run itself without social engineering, the employer who does not have to pay an excessive minimum wage to everyone, (including the losers) can then afford to pay more to his better workers, more to the ones who know more. More money for those folks doing the above trying to build a better life for their family. The unskilled workers then have motivation, something to work toward, some reason to try harder. The ladder of success should go vertically - start at the bottom, work your way up. But the Dems want it laying on the ground, horizontally so it's "fair". But all it does, all socialism does is prevent anyone from truly succeeding but setting low pre-determined standards of living, and then crippling industry to keep them all even, fair.

Would someone please explain to them that life is not "fair". My 8 year old can tell you that little fact of life. It ain't fair.

Did I mention they are hypocrites?I'm allergic to rotten acorns!

You should also see how much money Obama is giving Acorn in his great big socialist goody bag!

Thank allah for muslim sympathizers!

Obama makes his first television interview as President by doing a spot with an Arab reporter on Arab tv. He elaborates on his muslim family, his life lived in muslim countries, the largest in fact Indonesia. He goes to great pains to explain how he respects muslims, understands them, how he wants Americans to know that muslims want the same things we do.


For this he is applauded, and praised. The liberals are nearly O-basmic over it. "See THAT is what we need!" whew, they breath a sigh of relief and think now they won't bomb us anymore. That was all we needed, just to talk to them. Take the blame, tell them we respect them and World Peace is acheived. Anybody wanna shoot hoops now? Seriously in a week the man has single handedly solved every problem we have so why not play a little one on one in the new White House bball court? I thought we were told for four years NOT to say Barack Hussein Obama because people will think he is muslim? I thought it was racist to say he is a muslim sympathizer?
Yes of course the annoying little thing known as history is a bother but it doesn't bother so much if you ignore it. Desiring peace with the Japanese, and engaging in talks with them did not prevent them from planning and carrying out the bombing on Pearl Harbor. There is no lesson to be learned there. Isolationism didn't keep us out of WWI or WWII, pesky details.
The Stock Market crash in 1929 was NOT the beginning of the Great Depression. It was a beginning of a Great Recession. Hoover, and Roosevelt with their policies, free programs, enormous government tax and spend principles - creating Social Security (a mess we are still cleaning up) turned the Re-cession into a De-pression. A different approach would have gotten us out years earlier. Of course we didn't have the benefit of living through it then...now we do have the knowledge and they are going to ignore it.
The stimulus package is a trojan horse. It's meant not to stimulate the economy but rather to make giant leaps forward in socializing more and more private industry. It's the government with their hands in every pot (they are stealing back the chicken they promised). This is the opportunity they have been waiting for, they get to make a New, New Deal.
I'll post the details of the stimulus package next. In the first week this man has managed to screw up about a dozen different things. wow.
Of course now that the terrorists know we have a muslim sympathizer as a leader they won't want to hate or bomb us anymore. Man why didn't we think of that- appeasement, concession, surrender? This is brilliant! It's a good thing he went to Harvard.
Maybe we'll be safe during his term. Clinton didn't enforce our peace treaty with Irag and we were mostly safe at home...of course, they were just using the time to plan the "big one" but I'm sure that won't happen again. Clinton was the first black President and he told the muslim world we were wrong for going into Iraq and helping Kuwait. They only bombed the World Trade Center and the USS Cole which doesn't really count because how does that even affect us!?

Not feeling stimulated

Below is a breakdown of the proposed stimulus package. I know it's boring but browse it.

First problem I want to be sure gets out there is that most of the money in "rebates" or that might actually find it's way into the economy doesn't hit the market until...guess when? Mid-term election time, yep about 16 months from now. Completely unveiled attempt to keep control by sending people checks.

Lots of this money goes to buy things like - new hybrid cars for government employees and new computers. Does this stimulate the economy? Some argue it does. I say nope, not good enough.

Government contracts are fat for the companies but overpriced and ripe for corruption. It doesn't translate to more jobs if half the product can be turned out and sold for the same price.

How does contraception and more cash for Medicaid stimulate the economy? It doesn't. It promotes their agenda, their worldview. The Democrats have unfettered power and they are monopolizing on it by ramming through every program they ever dreamed up in this so-called "stimulus" package.

The infrastructure stuff is good, but do we really need to pay for broadband to rural areas? In these difficult times really is that a priority? This is a lot of money that our kids will be picking up the tab for in a couple decades. We need to pay very close attention to what is being spent, who is cashing the checks, and who is getting rich, who is really getting stimulated?

So...


Obama Stimulus Package Breakdown
January 26, 2009 - 11:16 ET


What is the money being spent on-general breakdown between infrastructure, tax cuts, etc…? Some highlights of the package, by the numbers:

• $825 billion total (as of 1/15/09) • $550 billion in new spending, described as thoughtful and carefully targeted priority investments with unprecedented accountability measures built in.

• $275 billion in tax relief ($1,000 tax cut for families, $500 tax cut for individuals through SS payroll deductions)

• $ 90 billion for infrastructure

• $ 87 billion Medicaid aid to states

• $ 79 billion school districts/public colleges to prevent cutbacks

• $ 54 billion to encourage energy production from renewable sources

• $ 41 billion for additional school funding ($14 billion for school modernizations and repairs, $13 billion for Title I, $13 billion for IDEA special education funding, $1 billion for education technology)

• $ 24 billion for "health information technology to prevent medical mistakes, provide better care to patients and introduce cost-saving efficiencies" and "to provide for preventative care and to evaluate the most effective healthcare treatments."

• $ 16 billion for science/technology ($10 billion for science facilities, research, and instrumentation; $6 billion to expand broadband to rural areas)

• $ 15 billion to increase Pell grants by $500

• $ 6 billion for the ambiguous "higher education modernization."
[Source: Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009]



Here is a further breakdown of the package: NOTE: The following are highlights of the package; for the full 13-page summary from the Appropriations Committee, click here: (as of 1/15/09)



Energy $32 billion: Funding for "smart electricity grid" to reduce waste

$16 billion: Renewable energy tax cuts and a tax credit for research and development on energy-related work, and a multiyear extension of renewable energy production tax credit

$6 billion: Funding to weatherize modest-income homes Science and Technology

$10 billion: Science facilities

$6 billion: High-speed Internet access for rural and underserved areas Infrastructure

$30 billion: Transportation projects

$31 billion: Construction and repair of federal buildings and other public infrastructure

$19 billion: Water projects

$10 billion: Rail and mass transit projects Education

$41 billion: Grants to local school districts

$79 billion: State fiscal relief to prevent cuts in state aid

$21 billion: School modernization ($15.6 billion to increase the Pell grant by $500; $6 billion for higher education modernization)

Health Care $39 billion: Subsidies to health insurance for unemployed; providing coverage through Medicaid

$87 billion: Help to states with Medicaid

$20 billion: Modernization of health-information technology systems

$4.1 billion: Preventative care Jobless Benefits

$43 billion for increased unemployment benefits and job training.

$39 billion to support those who lose their jobs by helping them to pay the cost of keeping their employer provided healthcare under COBRA and providing short-term options to be covered by Medicaid.

$20 billion to increase the food stamp benefit by over 13% in order to help defray rising food costs.



Taxes Individuals: *$500 per worker, $1,000 per couple tax cut for two years, costing about $140 billion. *Greater access to the $1,000-per-child tax credit for the working poor. *Expansion of the earned-income tax credit to include families with three children *A $2,500 college tuition tax credit. *Repeal of a requirement that a $7,500 first-time homebuyer tax credit be paid back over time.



Businesses: *An infusion of cash into money-losing companies by allowing them to claim tax credits on past profits dating back five years instead of two. *Bonus depreciation for businesses investing in new plants and equipment *Doubling of the amount small businesses can write off for capital investments and new equipment purchases. *Allowing businesses to claim a tax credit for hiring disconnected youth and veterans



[Sources: Associated Press: Highlights of Senate economic stimulus plan; January 23, 2009; WSJ: Stimulus Package Unveiled; January 16, 2009; Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009] When is the money being is going to be spent, and on what? The government wouldn't be able to spend at least one-fourth of a proposed $825 billion economic stimulus plan until after 2010, according to a preliminary report by the Congressional Business Office that suggests it may take longer than expected to boost the economy.



The government would spend about $26 billion of the money this year and $110 billion more next year, the report said. About $103 billion would be spent in 2011, while $53 billion would be spent in 2012 and $63 billion between 2013 and 2019.

• Less than $5 billion of the $30 billion set aside for highway spending would be spent within the next two years, the CBO said.

• Only $26 billion out of $274 billion in infrastructure spending would be delivered into the economy by the Sept. 30 end of the budget year, just 7 percent.

• Just one in seven dollars of a huge $18.5 billion investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy programs would be spent within a year and a half.

• About $907 million of a $6 billion plan to expand broadband access in rural and other underserved areas would be spent by 2011, CBO said.

• Just one-fourth of clean drinking water projects can be completed by October of next year.

• $275 billion worth of tax cuts to 95 percent of filers and a huge infusion of help for state governments is to be distributed into the economy more quickly. [Note: The CBO's analysis applied only to 40 percent of the overall stimulus bill, and doesn't cover tax cuts or efforts; a CBO report outlining all of its costs is expected in the next week or so.] •



The Obama administration said $3 of every $4 in the package should be spent within 18 months to have maximum impact on jobs and taxpayers; if House or Senate versions of the bill do not spend the money as quickly, the White House will work with lawmakers to achieve the goal of spending 75% of the overall package over the next year and a half.



[Source: AP: Three-quarters of stimulus to go in 18 months; January 22, 2009; Bloomberg News: Much of Stimulus Wont Be Spent Before 2011, CBO Says; January 20, 2009; link]



Who will be spending the money? Will the states be receiving any money to spend, community organizations? Churches? The economic stimulus plan now moving through Congress would shower billions of federal dollars on state and local governments desperate for cash: •

The House stimulus bill includes an extra $87 billion in federal aid to state Medicaid programs.

• It allots some $120 billion to boost state and city education programs.

• There's $4 billion for state and local anticrime initiatives in the legislation, not to mention $30-plus billion for highways and other infrastructure projects.

• $6.9 billion to help state and local governments make investments that make them more energy efficient and reduce carbon emissions.

• $87 billion to states, increasing through the end of FY 2010 the share of Medicaid costs the Federal government reimburses all states by 4.8 percent, with extra relief tied to rates of unemployment.

• $120 billion to states and school districts to stabilize budgets and prevent tax increases and deep cuts to critical education programs. Overall, about one-quarter of the entire $825 billion recovery package would be devoted to activities crucial to governors, mayors, and local school boards - making them among the plans biggest beneficiaries.



[Sources: Committee on Appropriations: January 15, 2009; Reuters: Roads, energy, states win in US stimulus plan;15 January 2009; Christian Science Monitor: States to win big in stimulus sweepstakes; House bill allots almost one-quarter of the $825 billion recovery package to states, localities. How will that boost the economy?; January 25, 2009; Link]

You gotta break some eggs

Obama restates his commitment to abortion rights
3 days ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama renewed his commitment to abortions rights on Thursday, saying the nation needs to find common ground in the contentious abortion debate so "our daughters have the same rights and opportunities as our sons."

Marking the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Obama said in a statement that the landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion represented a broader principle that government should not intrude on private family matters.

"On this anniversary, we must also recommit ourselves more broadly to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights and opportunities as our sons: the chance to attain a world-class education; to have fulfilling careers in any industry; to be treated fairly and paid equally for their work and to have no limits on their dreams," Obama said. "That is what I want for women everywhere."

Obama issued the statement as elsewhere in Washington and around the country anti-abortion rights activists marched in protest of the 1973 court case that legalized abortion. Up Pennsylvania Avenue, tens of thousands of abortion opponents rallied on the National Mall amid concerns they could face political setbacks under Obama.

Obama won election by emphasizing how the country could work together, even on difficult issues such as abortion. His across-the-spectrum approach brought together a political coalition that he has sought to sustain during his first days in office.

"While this is a sensitive and often divisive issue, no matter what our views, we are united in our determination to prevent unintended pregnancies, reduce the need for abortion and support women and families in the choices they make," Obama said. "To accomplish these goals, we must work to find common ground to expand access to affordable contraception, accurate health information and preventative services."

American public opinion about abortion has been fairly stable in recent decades, with polls almost always finding a narrow majority saying the procedure should be legal in all or most cases.

(The above piece is an AP article)

Did you notice what he wanted for all women, all our daughters? Education, career, equal pay, and no limit on their dreams. The only conclusion to be drawn from these comments are that the unborn children are an obstacle which cannot be overcome in attaining success.

Unplanned pregnancies can pose challenges of course but are they insurmountable? How many of us were unplanned? Does this mean that women who would "choose" motherhood as a life's work, unlike his own wife, who devote their lives to family, faith, personal growth and service have somehow missed out? Are just plain wrong?

Yes and yes. This precisely what they think. In fact many go a step further and say to live a life of motherhood alone is to do a disservice to all woman. They are not interested in choice. They want all women to use contraception, to attend school, develop their career, enjoy a thriving active sex life exploring their sexual freedom, at some point perhaps have a child or two at most. Then, put the child in daycare, return to their career, allow providers to care for and raise the child until it is a toddler at which time it is placed in state run preschool and then public education. So that this child will learn the same way of life it's mother did and the species will perpetuate itself in kind and ultimately change the world.

So that doesn't sound so bad right? I mean let's face it, it's the reality these days. Except there are a couple wrinkles in the theory.

Is it working?

The first is the notion of sexual freedom. When women engage in their sexual freedom they often find themselves pregnant. Many when faced with the option to abort cannot, will not. Men have been listening. They got the message loud and clear that women do not need men to have or raise babies. They got the message that abortions fix the problem. Are we surprised that they aren't feeling compelled to responsibility, marriage and devoting their life to family and fatherhood? Why should their dreams, education, and career be thwarted by an unwanted pregnancy? Where is their choice? The reality is babies are born out of wedlock, raised without fathers and live in poverty with their mothers. It hasn't gotten better, only worse.

The second problem is when everyone is focused on career and success, no one is really raising the children. If this works so well why so many teen pregnancies, teen suicides, teen std's, teen drug use, children on mood altering drugs, lower test scores, children in therapy, and on and on? Problems that simply did not exist on this scale when someone was raising the children.

The third problem, freedom. True freedom sexual or otherwise only exists with an equal portion of true responsibility. The Democrats keep trying to create new solutions for the problems that their very own worldview perpetuates. Teen pregnancy = daycare in high school. Std's = condoms in the counselor's office. Single moms = free childcare.

They keep thinking if they keep plugging away they will eventually get all the ducks in a row. A few generations will struggle but if we can have unfettered abortions and get women to really understand that everything will be better in the world if they JUST live their lives THIS way, then at some point the bumps will even out and the world will chug along smoothly.

You see they just need to weed out the uneducated, simple minded, manual labor working people who can't dream big enough.

They will of course need your tax dollars to make this dream a reality and there will be a continued halocaust of the unborn until this "change" can take hold but what's a few aborted babies from backwards, uneducated welfare moms, and minorities?

You gotta break some eggs...

Rooms for rent?

Do you have any rooms for rent? Barack Obama will be relocating all the terrorists from the Naval Detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. They'll be looking for digs so do you have some room for them?

Maybe we'll keep them in prison. Where? Your town? Your state?

What impact do you think these radical terrorists will have on the prison population? Do you think they will blend in and watch tv or I don't know spend their free time RECRUITING? Can you think of a better pool of potential recruits than a maximum security prison filled with disgruntled, damaged, evil people already capable of unspeakable crimes?

Can we keep them forever now? No. They will get out. It's a certainty.

Where will they go when they walk out of prison? If you voted for this President I hope they come to your town and not mine. I hope they pull up a bar stool at your favorite TGIF. I hope you have to start wondering if the terrorists might opt for a nice soft target like a school, or bus stop. Maybe when people start thinking that way they will realize how dangerous these people are, and how vulnerable we all truly are. Maybe then a huge, secure, military run prison a whole ocean away would seem like hmm...genius?

Will we be able to limit their communications in prison? No. We can't keep drugs, sex, crime, gangs, or anything else out of the prison system so how in the hell do you suppose we will keep these terrorists from transmitting information to the outside? We won't.

The very best, most brilliant part of this assanine plan. There is no plan. He has no idea what to do with them, what the effect will be, where they will go, how they'll be tried, chain of custody of evidence, what rights they get, where they go when they are released, what country we'll deport them to, he knows nothing.

Except this- he had to close it. He promised to close it down and the radicals who love him, are elated that he is making good on this promise. They paid good money to get this accomplished and the puppet in the big suit came through for them like a champ. Those who couldn't figure out who to vote for and went with the crowd...I wish you had paid more attention to the facts. "Close Gitmo!" was a catchy talking point, it fit nicely with "Hate Bush!"

Now pray tell what shall we do with the terrorists? Lawyers, trials, loopholes, and ultimately plane tickets home to the Middle East. Gee, I wonder how they'll be greeted there? I wonder what they will do with their freedom?

This is not just stupid it's dangerous. But maybe we'll keep gas prices low that'll even it all out right?

Barack Obama = more dead babies

Abortion is a pretty black and white issue, I don't mean a racial one. I mean you are either okay with it or you aren't. You either want more abortions or less, period. Democrats try to navigate a gray area they created to suit themselves, but it doesn't really exist. It is something conjured up to ease the consciences of Democrats who know in their gut that abortion kills babies, but whose political leanings in other areas preclude them from being Republicans.

The middle ground on this issue doesn't exist and I can prove it. Obama is restoring federal funding for abortions abroad. Now we can discuss the minutia all afternoon but what it comes down to when you peel away all the blathering...more dead babies. Not less. More.

Worse. More dead, impoverished, minority babies. More dead babies conceived by marginalized mothers around the world. More dead babies whose mothers have no education to even know what they do to their bodies or their children.

Why? Why would Democrats support this? Why would this person who claimed during the campaign to want less abortion make as one of his first actions in office, to lift a restriction allowing more abortions most likely on minorities like himself?

This one again we are told by the left is complicated but it's not. He, (they) know better than those mothers you see. He has decided they will be better off if their babies are dead. He has no answers, NO solutions for their poverty, their ignorance, the mistreatment of women, child rape and the oppression they live in. So... kill the babies, sterilize the mothers and at least they won't breed.

They won't say it out loud very often my friends, but THAT is precisely what they think. Look at the history and founding principles behind planned parenthood. They have no answers, no hope to offer, nothing but a damaged an empty womb. They prefer to spend our tax money on killing those babies than on feeding them because it is cheaper, that's the ugly truth.

Those who decry racism the loudest are at their core racists. They care not about Jewish people under fire in their homeland, not about Muslims oppressed by radicals and terrorists. They want isolationism. They do not want to spend a penny defending them. They prefer to spend our tax dollars on more preschool programs, tax checks for every person even those who refuse to work, oh and on killing more babies around abroad. Joe Biden said paying your taxes is patriotic. This is sickening. Your patriotic contribution will pay for the killing of a poor helpless baby. How can we ask God to Bless America if this is what we stand for? God Change America's heart maybe. Restore her conscience, her moral compass.

Abortion is like this, you either want more dead babies or less dead babies. Short and simple. Barack Obama lied. He wants more abortions, more dead babies, I know he does because he alone made it happen. What a proud first week for Democrats. If you are one of those Republicans or Independents who was swept up in the excitement and helped put this man in office, well there you go - you asked for change and you got it.